An Australian facilities journal

Est. 2004 · Australia

Commercial CleanersWorkplace hygiene, contracts and practice for Australian facilities

Independent writing for facility managers, contractors and the people who still have to clean the building on Monday.

Journal pages

Contracts and procurement

What a good cleaning SLA looks like in 2026

Response times, rectification, credits versus termination, force majeure after storms, indexation, and labour-hour floors. An SLA is a bargain you can inspect, not a scorecard from a software demo.

By Tom Bradley · Compliance correspondent · 22 July 2025 · Updated 18 March 2026

Brisbane city skyline under a clear sky
Photo: Unknown / Wikimedia Commons, Public domain. See also the image credits page.

A service level agreement that cannot be failed fairly is not an agreement. It is a brochure stapled to a purchase order. Australian cleaning contracts in 2026 still arrive with traffic-light annexes, “99 per cent satisfaction”, and a force majeure clause copied from a construction contract. None of that tells a night supervisor what to do when the washroom fails on a Tuesday.

This sits in the contracts and procurement hub because the SLA is what you live with after the tender. Commercial Cleaners is not a contractor and not a law firm. The useful SLA is short, inspectable, and dull.

Write clocks, not atmospheres

Response time is a clock. Rectification is a different clock. They get mashed together because both involve a ticket.

Response is when a competent person has seen the problem and said what will happen. Rectification is when the specification is met again. A phone call is not a clean washroom. A clean washroom that nobody logged is not a closed ticket.

Three clocks that match soil

Use a small set of clocks that match soil:

  • Urgent occupancy. Vomit, blood, a flood that is still a cleaning job, a toilet out of service, a spill in a lift. Response in the same attend if the crew is on site; within a stated number of hours if they are not. Rectification as soon as the method allows, including drying time you will not pretend away.
  • In-scope fail found on inspection. Missed tea point, empty dispensers you own, smeared tenancy glass, a bin not emptied. Response next business day. Rectification within one or two attends, named.
  • Periodic miss. High dust, interim carpet, machine scrub not done in the month it was due. Response in the monthly review. Rectification inside a stated number of days, not “next cycle” forever.

Do not write a four-hour response for every ticket. You will ignore it or pull the night crew off floors you already paid for. Day-time urgent work is a day attend or a call-out. Say who starts the clock — a ticket or a named inspector’s fail, not a tenant email to a personal inbox — and when it pauses: no access, a function still in the room, a building defect.

Writing a specification a night crew can use is the sibling document. The SLA should point at those outcomes, not invent a second vocabulary. If the spec says “no visible food residue in the microwave”, the SLA fail is that sentence.

Rectification is work, not a mood repair

The crew must know what “put it right” means. Rework the room to the specification. Photograph or sign the close. Someone on your side samples the close — not every ticket, enough that a false close is risky.

If the same room fails three times in a quarter, the SLA should escalate automatically: joint walk, labour-model check, then the credit or default conversation. Repeating the same email in a louder font is not escalation.

Separate extra work from rectification in the clocks. A Sunday function is extra. A Sunday return to a kitchen that was in last night’s scope is rectification. Contractors will call both “additional”. Your invoice file should not.

Where a fail is caused by the building — no hot water, a locked store, a card system that died — the clock should pause and the finding should still be recorded. An SLA that only ever runs against the mop will be gamed by silence about blockers.

Credits are a nudge. Termination is a door

Service credits have a bad reputation because they are either too small to care about or so large they become a second negotiation. In cleaning they work when they are boring and automatic.

Credit against a short list:

  • Attendance below the labour-hour floor for a stated week, unless you approved the shortfall
  • Rectifications still open after the window, counted per event
  • Washroom run-outs you own, above a small monthly allowance for genuine usage spikes
  • A periodic missed and not caught up inside the rectification window

Publish the arithmetic in the SLA. A credit that needs a steering committee will not be applied, and then it is not a term.

Do not credit “satisfaction” or a single blended inspection score. Those are too easy to argue. Cleaning KPIs that go beyond “looks clean” can inform the conversation. The credit should attach to the few measures you can count without a philosophy seminar.

Termination and step-in sit behind the credits. Use them for collapse, not for a bad fortnight. Collapse looks like this: the labour model has not been staffed for weeks, the named supervisor does not exist, modern-slavery or Award questions have no answer, WHS incidents are not reported, or the same must-see rooms fail after two joint walks. Write a cure period that is long enough to recruit a leading hand and short enough that you are not funding a fiction for a quarter.

Step-in — you or another contractor finish the nights — is more useful than theatrical termination in a live tower. Say who pays, what happens to keys, and how the incumbent is stood down without leaving the building unalarmed. List the cleaning-specific defaults. Do not hide them in a general “material breach”.

Force majeure after storms, and the jobs that are not acts of God

Australian summers and east-coast rain will close roads, flood docks and cancel night shifts. A force majeure clause that treats every wet Tuesday as an act of God is how hours disappear. A clause that admits no weather at all is how you punish a crew that cannot get across a flooded causeway.

Write it as a notice and a labour rule, not as poetry.

  • Named events: declared natural disasters, a building the fire services have closed, a power outage that makes the work unsafe, a public-health direction that closes the floor.
  • Notice: as soon as practicable, with the sites affected and the hours lost.
  • Catch-up: which work is deferred, which is extra when it is done, which is simply lost because the soil did not wait.
  • Not force majeure: ordinary rain, a sick leading hand, a van that would not start, a chemical delivery that the contractor forgot, staff at a different site.

After a storm the building often needs extra work that is not the nightly specification. That is a variation, not force majeure. Bushfire smoke, unsafe heat and a cyclone watch are local facts. Follow the building’s emergency plan and Safe Work Australia heat and air-quality guidance. Hours not worked are not billed. Catch-up is agreed in writing the next day.

Indexation that tracks labour, not a vibe

Cleaning prices in Australia are labour. If you index the contract to a general CPI figure and wages move differently, you will get a quiet reduction in hours. If you refuse all indexation, you will get the hours reduction anyway, or a contractor who exits.

A 2026 SLA should say:

  • What is indexed — the labour line at least
  • To what — a stated Award increase, a stated labour index, or a fixed percentage cap with a reopen if the Award moves more
  • When — anniversary, or when the Award actually changes
  • What is not indexed without a conversation — consumables that spiked, a new waste levy, a security change you imposed

Do not accept “prices will be reviewed in good faith”, or automatic pass-through of every contractor cost. If the Award moves and your floor hours stay the same, the price or the scope moves. Pretending both can stay still is how underpayment risk lands back on the host.

Labour-hour floors are the adult clause

The most useful number in a 2026 cleaning SLA is the hours you bought. Not a square-metre rate. Not a satisfaction target. Hours, by site or by zone, for nightly, day and periodic work.

Floor them. The contractor may use fewer hours on a quiet week if you agree in writing. They may not silently thin the roster and keep the invoice. Attendance against the floor is a KPI you can inspect. It is also how you stay on the right side of the Award conversation: a price that cannot employ the floor hours lawfully is a price you should not have accepted.

Write the change rule. Hours go up when you add a floor, an end-of-trip, or a café. Hours go down when a tenancy is empty and you have walked the reduced scope. Both are variations. A hybrid occupancy is not a licence to guess.

Supervision hours belong on the floor if you paid for a supervisor. A “complimentary” supervisor who vanishes after mobilisation was never complimentary.

Relief is part of the floor. If the leading hand is on leave, the hours still exist. A floor that assumes nobody gets sick is a brochure.

Leave out slogans you cannot fail, COVID theatre nobody runs, and a twenty-page KPI manual the night supervisor has never seen. Keep insurance, WHS cooperation, keys. Point at the specification for the rooms. The SLA should fit in a sitting.

A 2026 SLA is stricter on hours and calmer on software than the ones written in 2019. It assumes weather, Award movements and thin labour. Read it as if you will apply a credit in front of a person who knows the building. If you would be embarrassed, cut the clause or make it true.

Questions readers send us

Should a cleaning SLA include automatic credits?
Yes, for a short list of repeated, well-defined fails — attendance shortfalls, open rectifications past the window, run-outs you own. No, as a substitute for termination rights when the labour model has collapsed. Credits keep people honest. They do not fix a contract that was priced as fiction.
How tight should response times be?
Tight enough that a vomit in a lift is same-shift, and loose enough that a high-dust miss is not treated as an emergency. Write two or three clocks, not one. A single four-hour response for every ticket will be ignored or will pull the night crew off the specification.
Do we need a labour-hour floor in 2026?
If you care about the Award and about the building, yes. A price without hours is a story. Floor the hours you bought, with a rule for how they can change, and inspect attendance against that floor.

Continue in Contracts and procurement